數位天堂

Nokia：科技始終來自於人性; 拜耳：如果文明不能使我們更相愛，那科技便失去意義！
歡迎您的加入，讓我們一起討論科技與環保的整合應用...

您尚未登入。

頁次: 1

 

#1 2011-06-30 08:56:16

Aven
天使
來自: 數位天堂
註冊日期: 2007-07-15
文章數: 2266
網站

網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

去年我們寫過世界杯 Wireless-N Gigabit Router 四強效能 PK 賽，提供網友選購高階無線 Router 的一個參考依據，而近期自電信市場龍頭-中華電信推出 50M 千元有找方案，各大電信業者無不下猛藥，紛紛推出 50M 甚至 100M 等大頻寬，來搶攻家庭上網市場，短短一兩個禮拜，已造就不小的網路升級風潮，現在朋友之間打招呼時，也不忘順口問一句："你家有幾個妹M?"。雖說如此，但我們還是常聽到有人在抱怨網路升級後，連線品質不如預期、連線速度上不去諸如此類的問題。

https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_gigabit_pk_02.jpg

老舊網路設備拖跨連線效能
暫且不論實際傳輸度是否可以達到 ISP 所標榜的速率，我們是否曾檢視家裡的 Router NAT 效能，在您抱怨連線速度種種問題背後，極有可能網路瓶頸還是落在我們家裡的 Router 身上。有鑑於此，我們就來幫大家彙整一下市面上幾款小而美、千元內可以輕鬆入門機種的網路效能測試報告。

集體疊疊樂
這一次我們拿到在本地市場上市佔率較高的機型，依廠牌字母排序分別是ASUS RT-N10、ASUS RT-N10+、D-Link DIR-300 B1 及 TP-Link TL-WR741ND，即便是入門機種，不過各家都可以提供三年保固 yes
https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_u10004pk_01.jpg

拆封後，正面疊疊樂，依上自下分別是：
WR741ND、DIR-300 B1、RT-N10 以及 RT-N10+
https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_u10004pk_02.jpg

背面疊疊樂，依上自下分別是：
WR741ND、DIR-300 B1、RT-N10 以及 RT-N10+
https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_u10004pk_03.jpg

無線天線比一比
WR741ND > RT-N10+ > RT-N10 = DIR-300 B1
WR741ND：叫我大支兄!!
https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_u10004pk_04.jpg
註：RT-N10+ 天線為不可更換式

底下是這四台基本硬體規格：
https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_u10004pk_spec.gif
註：以上售價以 2011/6/30 PCHome 網路購物賣場標示價格

網路效能測試
測試環境：
Server：Synology DS211 NAS
PC：ASUS EeeBOX B204 Windows XP
Firewall：disable
網路線：CAT-6
無線連線模式：WPA2-personal AES / Bandwidth:40Mhz
WAN to LAN：以 DMZ 模式測試
測試工具：iperf 同時開5個session，連續測試60秒
除了上述設定外，其餘皆為系統預設值

RT-N10
韌體版本：1.0.1.6
LAN to LAN：93.3Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1848] local 192.168.1.2 port 1325 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.2 port 1322 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.2 port 1324 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.2 port 1321 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.2 port 1323 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.3 Mbits/sec


WLAN to LAN：68.8Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1848] local 192.168.1.4 port 1367 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.4 port 1365 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.4 port 1366 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.4 port 1363 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.4 port 1364 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 101 MBytes 14.2 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 95.2 MBytes 13.3 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 101 MBytes 14.1 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 94.3 MBytes 13.2 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 101 MBytes 14.1 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 493 MBytes 68.8 Mbits/sec


LAN to WAN：93.2Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1912] local 192.168.1.2 port 3660 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.2 port 3663 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.2 port 3662 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.2 port 3661 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.2 port 3664 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 131 MBytes 18.2 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 143 MBytes 20.0 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 127 MBytes 17.8 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 129 MBytes 18.0 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 137 MBytes 19.1 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.2 Mbits/sec


WAN to LAN：94.0Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.10 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.10, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 212 KByte (WARNING: requested 128 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 7] local 192.168.2.70 port 59710 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.2.70 port 59706 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 4] local 192.168.2.70 port 59707 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.2.70 port 59708 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.2.70 port 59709 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0-60.0 sec 123 MBytes 17.1 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 7] 0.0-60.0 sec 124 MBytes 17.3 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-60.0 sec 152 MBytes 21.2 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 139 MBytes 19.4 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 6] 0.0-60.1 sec 137 MBytes 19.1 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 673 MBytes 94.0 Mbits/sec


RT-N10+
韌體版本：2.0.1.6
LAN to LAN：93.3Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1896] local 192.168.1.3 port 2006 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.3 port 2007 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.3 port 2005 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.3 port 2009 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.3 port 2008 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.3 Mbits/sec


WLAN to LAN：79.8Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1912] local 192.168.1.4 port 2016 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.4 port 2017 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.4 port 2019 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.4 port 2020 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.4 port 2018 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1864] 0.0-60.0 sec 115 MBytes 16.1 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.0 sec 118 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.0 sec 116 MBytes 16.3 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.0 sec 92.6 MBytes 12.9 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.0 sec 129 MBytes 18.0 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.0 sec 571 MBytes 79.8 Mbits/sec


LAN to WAN：56.5Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1864] local 192.168.1.2 port 3258 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.2 port 3259 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.2 port 3256 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.2 port 3255 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.2 port 3257 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 80.9 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 80.8 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 80.6 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 81.0 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 81.2 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 405 MBytes 56.5 Mbits/sec


WAN to LAN：52.2Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.10 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.10, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 212 KByte (WARNING: requested 128 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 7] local 192.168.2.70 port 52851 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.2.70 port 52847 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 4] local 192.168.2.70 port 52848 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.2.70 port 52849 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.2.70 port 52850 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 65.8 MBytes 9.19 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 7] 0.0-60.0 sec 92.5 MBytes 12.9 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-60.1 sec 95.6 MBytes 13.4 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0-60.1 sec 58.9 MBytes 8.23 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 6] 0.0-60.1 sec 60.9 MBytes 8.49 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 374 MBytes 52.2 Mbits/sec


DIR-300
韌體版本：2.04
LAN to LAN：93.3Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1896] local 192.168.1.101 port 2181 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.101 port 2180 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.101 port 2184 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.101 port 2182 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.101 port 2183 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.0 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.3 Mbits/sec


WLAN to LAN：60.7Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1912] local 192.168.1.102 port 2218 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.102 port 2221 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.102 port 2220 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.102 port 2219 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.102 port 2222 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 89.8 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 89.2 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 86.6 MBytes 12.1 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 86.5 MBytes 12.1 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 82.7 MBytes 11.5 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 435 MBytes 60.7 Mbits/sec


LAN to WAN：93.4Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1880] local 192.168.1.100 port 3107 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.100 port 3109 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.100 port 3105 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.100 port 3108 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.100 port 3106 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.4 Mbits/sec


WAN to LAN：94.1Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.10 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.10, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 212 KByte (WARNING: requested 128 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 7] local 192.168.2.70 port 55557 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.2.70 port 55553 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 4] local 192.168.2.70 port 55554 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.2.70 port 55555 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.2.70 port 55556 connected with 192.168.2.10 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 132 MBytes 18.5 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-60.0 sec 137 MBytes 19.1 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 6] 0.0-60.0 sec 134 MBytes 18.8 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 7] 0.0-60.0 sec 131 MBytes 18.3 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0-60.1 sec 140 MBytes 19.5 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 674 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec


WR741ND
韌體版本：3.9.19 Build 100312 Rel.36350n
LAN to LAN：93.3Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1912] local 192.168.1.101 port 2464 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.101 port 2465 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.101 port 2466 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.101 port 2467 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.101 port 2468 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.3 Mbits/sec


WLAN to LAN：88.5Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.1.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1880] local 192.168.1.102 port 2577 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1848] local 192.168.1.102 port 2579 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.102 port 2575 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.102 port 2576 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.102 port 2578 connected with 192.168.1.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.0 sec 139 MBytes 19.5 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.0 sec 130 MBytes 18.2 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.0 sec 111 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.0 sec 146 MBytes 20.4 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 107 MBytes 14.9 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 634 MBytes 88.5 Mbits/sec


LAN to WAN：93.2Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.70 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.70, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 128 KByte ------------------------------------------------------------ [1848] local 192.168.1.101 port 1937 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1896] local 192.168.1.101 port 1934 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1864] local 192.168.1.101 port 1936 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1912] local 192.168.1.101 port 1933 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [1880] local 192.168.1.101 port 1935 connected with 192.168.2.70 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [1896] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1880] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1912] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [1848] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [1864] 0.0-60.1 sec 134 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 668 MBytes 93.2 Mbits/sec


WAN to LAN：94.2Mbps

>iperf -c 192.168.2.249 -w 128k -t 60 -P 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.2.249, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 212 KByte (WARNING: requested 128 KByte) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 7] local 192.168.2.70 port 45315 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 3] local 192.168.2.70 port 45311 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 4] local 192.168.2.70 port 45312 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 5] local 192.168.2.70 port 45313 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ 6] local 192.168.2.70 port 45314 connected with 192.168.2.249 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 6] 0.0-60.0 sec 132 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-60.0 sec 139 MBytes 19.4 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.0-60.1 sec 133 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 7] 0.0-60.1 sec 138 MBytes 19.2 Mbits/sec [SUM] 0.0-60.1 sec 674 MBytes 94.2 Mbits/sec


各項數據整理統計如下：
https://digiland.tw/uploads/2_u10004pk_throughput.gif

結論：
這一次的測試結果出爐，從上面的長條圖中可以看得出來，這次評測的四台小鋼砲NAT效能都可以達到50M的水準，其中TP-Link TL-WR741ND 各項數據最為平均，而且在各項評測結果中幾乎也都能取得領先的優勢，再搭配合宜的售價，相信應該可以攏絡不少人心。另外，有網友提到這次評測皆以原廠韌體為測試平台，希望能以相同韌體(如dd-wrt)再測一次，這一點我們會納入考量，或許測試出來結果又是不同的景象，敬請請拭目以待。

延伸閱讀：
D-Link DIR-300 A1 & B1 超級比一比
ASUS RT-N10 / RT-N10+ 超級比一比
網路小鋼砲 - TP-Link TL-WR741ND 開箱
世界杯 Wireless-N Gigabit Router 四強效能 PK 賽



技術問題請於論壇上集眾人之力公開討論，感恩 thankgod

離線

 

#2 2011-07-03 13:45:18

e3a260
新生
註冊日期: 2009-03-05
文章數: 38
目前積分 :   0 

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

感謝站大的測試thankgod

重點就是最後那兩張圖吧
話說這兩天tplink 741也降價了
699帶回家,CP值有兩層樓這麼高milk


離線

 

#3 2011-07-05 01:03:24

kenwang168
新生
來自: 台中
註冊日期: 2011-06-29
文章數: 18
目前積分 :   0 

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

如果刷番茄 或是DD  應該更精彩
因為會進來論壇的村民 幾乎買回家就先刷下去了

離線

 

#4 2011-07-05 14:46:16

cts1628
新生
註冊日期: 2009-03-04
文章數: 46
目前積分 :   0 

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

好像少寫了Best Buy或是Our Choice哦
不過視力2.0的應該看得出來要買哪一台

關於測試韌體,可以考慮取這四台的最大公因數:dd-wrt 最為測試平台
純建議啦,我只負責出一張嘴XD

離線

 

#5 2011-07-08 09:09:56

thx
精靈
註冊日期: 2008-01-29
文章數: 99
目前積分 :   1 
網站

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

三家IC Soultion  IC 硬體規格比教
1.BCM5356MIPS 74K CPU core with 32-KB instruction cache and a 32K data cache ,管線也比較多
性能最好

2.Ralink RT3050F  802.11n Wireless Single Chip AP/Router SoC. ...
  MIPS 24KEc 320MHz with 32KB I-cache/16KB D cache 

3.AR7240 MIPS 24Kc

就運算硬體規格 1> 2 > 3   但是實際跑起來不是那樣一回事
當然跟軟體最佳化也有觀

RF 層面的話 沒看到很好分析數據的

性價比的話  最好還是MW300R =TP 841N ,741 是1T 1R  841 2T,2R

V1  對841N  V5
V2  對841N  V7


Opensources,虛擬化,Voip,FC ,Storage  ,Embedded system 無聊人士實驗室
http://www.osslab.com.tw

離線

 

#6 2011-07-09 09:47:31

ForgotFun
新生
註冊日期: 2010-07-07
文章數: 40
目前積分 :   1 
網站

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

thx 提到:

三家IC Soultion  IC 硬體規格比教
1.BCM5356MIPS 74K CPU core with 32-KB instruction cache and a 32K data cache ,管線也比較多
性能最好

2.Ralink RT3050F  802.11n Wireless Single Chip AP/Router SoC. ...
  MIPS 24KEc 320MHz with 32KB I-cache/16KB D cache 

3.AR7240 MIPS 24Kc

就運算硬體規格 1> 2 > 3   但是實際跑起來不是那樣一回事
當然跟軟體最佳化也有觀

RF 層面的話 沒看到很好分析數據的

性價比的話  最好還是MW300R =TP 841N ,741 是1T 1R  841 2T,2R

V1  對841N  V5
V2  對841N  V7

NO,NO,NO Broadcom 的强项是做无线芯片和交换机，可以说远远甩开了Atheros和Ralink。Ralink在处理器方面稍微差,Atheros在做高频和高性能处理器方面技术是最好的，Atheros还有800MHZ的处理器。高频处理器设计都是非常难的，Atheors在网络处理器的设计上应该是超越了BCM，事实也是如此。BCM的处理器比Ralink稍微强点。所以相同主频下的性能排名应该是 Atheros > BCM >Ralink

離線

 

#7 2011-07-24 02:50:01

patrick753
新生
註冊日期: 2010-08-26
文章數: 9
目前積分 :   0 

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

這是一篇相當好的文章
只可惜會在意ROUTER效能的
大都會買高級一點的
而買這種入門款的
通常是不會特別去看效能的

離線

 

#8 2011-08-12 14:00:27

linuxok
新生
註冊日期: 2011-08-12
文章數: 2
目前積分 :   0 

Re: 網路小鋼砲 - 效能集體評測

樓主不知有作Wireless訊號強弱比較，我拿ASUS 520GC及TP-Link 741ND比較，隔一層樓, ASUS 在Win7有3格訊號，TP-Link只有1格。TP-Link配的還是5 dBi的天線，結果輸了!

離線

 

 

頁次: 1

相關討論主題

主題 回覆 點閱 最後發表
網路小鋼砲 - TP-Link TL-WR741ND 開箱 作者 Aven  [ 1 2 ]
12 71487 2012-02-15 21:03:53 作者 Aven

友情連結

論壇頁尾

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2018 Rickard Andersson
RSS Feed